---
title: "Agreement on the regulation and directive on cross-border access to electronic evidence"
id: "2442"
type: "post"
slug: "agreement-on-the-regulation-and-directive-on-cross-border-access-to-electronic-evidence"
published_at: "2023-02-21T09:07:48+00:00"
modified_at: "2026-02-19T18:15:23+00:00"
url: "https://www.august-debouzy.com/en/legal-article/agreement-on-the-regulation-and-directive-on-cross-border-access-to-electronic-evidence/"
markdown_url: "https://www.august-debouzy.com/en/legal-article/agreement-on-the-regulation-and-directive-on-cross-border-access-to-electronic-evidence.md"
taxonomy_category:
  - "Legal Article"
taxonomy_language:
  - "English"
taxonomy_post_translations:
  - "pll_6980b379704da"
taxonomy_tax_expertise:
  - "European Law"
  - "European Litigation"
---

Summarize with AI

An agreement has finally been reached between the presidency of the Council and the European Parliament on the draft regulation and draft directive on cross-border access to electronic evidence. **The regulation on European orders for the production and preservation of electronic evidence in criminal matters (or “e-evidence” regulation) creates European production and preservation orders that can be issued by Member States’ judicial authorities directly to service** providers to obtain or preserve electronic evidence, regardless of the location of the data.

Such orders can cover all categories of data, including subscriber, traffic and content data. However, traffic data (except when required for the sole purpose of user identification) and content data may only be requested for criminal offences punishable in the issuing country by a maximum three-year sentence or for specific offences relating to cybercrime, child pornography, counterfeiting of non-cash means of payment, or terrorism. The service provider must respond to the production order within no later than 10 days (or 8 hours in some emergency situations). In case of non-production of the requested data, the financial penalties go up to 2% of the service provider’s worldwide annual turnover.

Except in cases where the offense has been or will probably be committed in the issuing country and/or the person whose data is sought resides in its territory, the requesting judicial authority must inform the enforcing state to give it the opportunity to raise one or more grounds for refusal set out in the legislation, for example, that the requested data is protected. The enforcing state has 10 days to respond (or 96 hours in emergency situations).

If, in emergency situations, the data has already been transferred, the issuing authority will have to delete or otherwise restrict the data or comply with the conditions set for its use. In parallel to the e-evidence regulation, another **directive will require service providers to appoint legal representatives or designated establishments authorized to receive and respond to such orders.**

Share

- Linkedin
- Copy Link

Summarize with AI

### Practice Area

2

- [European Law](https://www.august-debouzy.com/en/tax-expertise/european-law/)
- [European Litigation](https://www.august-debouzy.com/en/tax-expertise/european-litigation/)

## Discover more content that might interest you

News

[27/07/26 Legal Article 5 min EU Green Taxonomy: General Court Annuls Exclusion of Business Aircraft Manufacturing The General Court of the European Union annulled the EU Green Taxonomy provisions excluding business aircraft manufacturing from transitional activities, finding that the European Commission had based its decision on an incomplete and flawed assessment. The ruling could have significant implications for financing and sustainability reporting in the aviation sector. Read more](https://www.august-debouzy.com/en/legal-article/eu-green-taxonomy-general-court-annuls-exclusion-of-business-aircraft-manufacturing/)
[27/07/26 Legal Article 9 min The EU’s New Anti-Corruption Directive: A Landmark Reform with Unresolved Tensions Directive (EU) 2026/1021 marks a major step towards harmonising anti-corruption laws across Europe. This article examines its key provisions, remaining limitations, and the changes required to align French law with the new framework. Read more](https://www.august-debouzy.com/en/legal-article/the-eus-new-anti-corruption-directive-a-landmark-reform-with-unresolved-tensions-2/)
[02/09/25 Legal Article 5 min Implementation of the Trade Agreement Between the European Union and the United States: Procedural Steps, Legal Issues, and Political Risks 1. What is the legal scope of the announcements made on July 27 in Scotland? The July 27 agreement between the President of the United States and the Pr Read more](https://www.august-debouzy.com/en/legal-article/implementation-of-the-trade-agreement-between-the-european-union-and-the-united-states-procedural-steps-legal-issues-and-political-risks/)