AD Article
UPC WAZE's Rule 28: One of the Ways to Direct UPC Case Traffic Jam ?
Nearly three years after the Unified Patent Court opened its doors, the UPC first-instance court docket has developed a pronounced traffic jam in the Germa
Contact
French I English I German
CHAMBERS AND PARTNERS FRANCE 2026
Intellectual Property : Patents : Up and Coming
LEGAL 500 EMEA 2026
Intellectual property: Patents: Leading Partners
BEST LAWYERS 2026
(Recognized in Best Lawyers since 2025)
Intellectual Property Law
CHAMBERS AND PARTNERS GLOBAL 2025
Intellectual Property : Patents : Up and Coming
MIP - IP STARS 2024
Patent disputes: Tier 1
Rising star (2023)
IAM PATENT 1000 FRANCE 2024
Litigation : Gold (Tier 1/3)
Prosecution : Bronze (Tier 3/3)
Transactions : Recommended
AD Article
UPC WAZE's Rule 28: One of the Ways to Direct UPC Case Traffic Jam ?
Nearly three years after the Unified Patent Court opened its doors, the UPC first-instance court docket has developed a pronounced traffic jam in the Germa
AD Article
Clarity On Knotty Patent Jurisdiction Questions From CJEU
Despite the emergence of the Unified Patent Court in 2023, with jurisdiction over 18 of the 27 European Union member states for both infringement and validity, the national patent courts in the EU retain a competitive jurisdiction.
AD Article
UPC – The interpretation of patent claims by the UPC
Claim interpretation is central in patent infringement and revocation litigation. After a year and a half of activity, the Unified Patent Court (UPC) has published several decisions clarifying its method of interpreting patent claims.
AD Article
1st decisions on the merits issued by the UPC Central Division (2/2): key findings from the CD Paris decisions of 19 and 29 July
On 19 July, we published the first part of our study on the assessment of inventive step by the UPC Central Division. On the same day, the Central Division
AD Article
1st decisions on the merits issued by the UPC Central Division (1/2): what does the UPC say about the assessment of inventive step compared to the EPO?
Since the entry into force of the Unified Patent Court (UPC), one of the burning questions that practitioners have in mind is whether the UPC will apply the problem-solution approach of the European Patent Office (EPO) in its assessment of the inventive step. While it is still too early to draw any conclusions, it would appear from the decisions we have studied that the UPC applies its own standards, drawing inspiration from the EPO's problem-solution approach without duplicating it. We offer here a first analysis of how UPC assessed inventive step up to the recent decisions of the Central Division issued on 16 July (Sanofi v. Amgen and Regeneron v. Amgen ). A second publication will focus on the Central Division's decisions of July 19 (Meril v. Edwards Lifesciences ).
AD Article
UPC already in infringement of article 6 ECHR ?
Is the UPC appeal court so in its youth that it has not yet learned to count up to 5 (at least without the help of its technically qualified judges) ?
AD Article
EPO anticipates unitary patent with start of transitional measures
The European Patent Office ("EPO") has activated these two measures opening up the use of the unitary patent for patent applications ready to be granted, i
AD Article
E-filing of French patent applications: French PTO (INPI) shuffle its feet after messing with PLT
August & Debouzy wins its proceedings for exceeding its power (ultra vires) before the Conseil d'Etat against the decision of the Director of the
AD Article
19th version of the UPC Rules of Procedure: the opt-out becomes more complex with the possibility of its removal
After the opt-out and the correction of the opt-out, there is now the addition of... the removal of the opt-out. Abstract: The 19th version of the Rules
AD Article
Opposition before the INPI: publication of the first opposition decision
In our article of 2 March 2022, we reported our impressions on the firsts oral proceedings before the INPI[1] and pointed out that they are very similar to
More
Publications